|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

The kdbuswreck

The kdbuswreck

Posted Apr 23, 2015 8:41 UTC (Thu) by smurf (subscriber, #17840)
In reply to: The kdbuswreck by ncm
Parent article: The kdbuswreck

You may well be right (Kerberos, anybody?), but waiting another year or more for a comprehensive ticket subsystem to materialize ^w be developed and debugged seems rather unproductive.

kdbus doesn't add anything to the way systemd handles capabilities, except remove the race condition inherent in checking for them. Passing them through kdbus also doesn't add any and privacy concerns because quite frankly, the knowledge whether or not a particular process does or does not have a particular capability is not a security hole; call me somewhat dumb but offhand I can't think of a way to make it into one.

Rejecting kdbus just because it uses caps is thus somewhat disingenious.


to post comments

The kdbuswreck

Posted Apr 23, 2015 22:31 UTC (Thu) by luto (guest, #39314) [Link]

Not quite. Systemd doesn't use caps for dbus on non-kdbus systems.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds