Google: Maintaining digital certificate security
Google: Maintaining digital certificate security
Posted Mar 24, 2015 23:00 UTC (Tue) by josh (subscriber, #17465)In reply to: Google: Maintaining digital certificate security by robbe
Parent article: Google: Maintaining digital certificate security
Good. It should be absurdly hard. If it were easier, more people would do it.
Posted Mar 24, 2015 23:18 UTC (Tue)
by pboddie (guest, #50784)
[Link]
Posted Mar 25, 2015 6:44 UTC (Wed)
by epa (subscriber, #39769)
[Link]
Posted Mar 26, 2015 21:30 UTC (Thu)
by robbe (guest, #16131)
[Link] (1 responses)
Unfortunately, the employer will just stay with IE in this case. Not installing Firefox is certainly easier than rolling it out *and* fudging one or more certificates into its trusted store.
Maybe a better way is to make adding a MITM cert easier, but show a different visual cue in the "security indicator" next to the URL. Example:
Padlock: we're pretty sure nobody can listen in
Posted Mar 26, 2015 22:19 UTC (Thu)
by josh (subscriber, #17465)
[Link]
As far as the right to do so: in my opinion, the provider of a network can intercept traffic if they want, but should not be allowed to do so without notice and consent.
Google: Maintaining digital certificate security
Google: Maintaining digital certificate security
Google: Maintaining digital certificate security
Stethoscope: someone is watching your decrypted traffic, ostensibly for malware, but insulting your boss or planning a coup is probably not a good idea either
Megaphone: only politeness protects you, don't do anything you wouldn't do in the cafeteria
Google: Maintaining digital certificate security
