Re: [PATCH] genirq: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND
[Posted March 11, 2015 by corbet]
| From: |
| Arnd Bergmann <arnd-AT-arndb.de> |
| To: |
| linux-arm-kernel-AT-lists.infradead.org |
| Subject: |
| Re: [PATCH] genirq: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND |
| Date: |
| Wed, 04 Mar 2015 23:27:37 +0100 |
| Message-ID: |
| <6591581.ooCMyGoxxx@wuerfel> |
| Cc: |
| Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni-AT-free-electrons.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-AT-arm.com>, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon-AT-free-electrons.com>, Jason Cooper <jason-AT-lakedaemon.net>, Linux PM list <linux-pm-AT-vger.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz-AT-infradead.org>, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre-AT-atmel.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-AT-rjwysocki.net>, "linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx-AT-linutronix.de>, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj-AT-jcrosoft.com> |
| Archive‑link: | |
Article |
On Wednesday 04 March 2015 23:17:29 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote :
> > With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share
> > and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by
> ^ an
>
>
> > +In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and an
> > +IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device driver
> > +must be able to discern spurious IRQs from genuine wakeup events (signalling
>
> And genuine question, should we use British English or American English
> or we don't care ?
I believe most developers use Incorrect English, the second most common
is American English, followed by Indian English and British English. ;-)
More seriously, just try to be consistent within one file or subsystem.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
