The kernel's code of conflict

What laws? And how do you define discrimination?

Firstly, Linux is international, so you can't use American law as your guideline. And I certainly wouldn't hold America up as a very good example of anti-discrimination, it's much more an example of Politically Correct discrimination ...

May I give you a simple example of where anti-discrimination has discriminated against me ... I couldn't participate in any race-related discussions on Groklaw. I got censored. Because I speak English, not American.

The problem was simply down to language - in America I understand it is unacceptable to use the word "black". Unfortunately for me, that is normal acceptable usage in the UK. AND I HAVE NO ALTERNATIVE AVAILABLE!!! Most black people near me consider themselves either Nigerian or Caribbean. "African Briton" would be totally unacceptable and offensive to both of them, they're British for *** sake, and completely wrong to the second lot - the Caribbean isn't part of Africa!

And then be careful of other sensitivities - I am British of Caribbean descent, but I'm white!

Finding a way through the maelstrom of the politically correct who are determined to take offense at every opportunity is difficult. Any code of conduct needs to target them too! My code of conduct would be simple:

(1) Everybody deserves respect by default. In the absence of contrary evidence always assume the best.
(2) Do not seek to cause offence, and be sensitive to cultural differences.
(3) Be slow to take offence, but quick to pour oil on troubled waters if you see it.

Horribly bland, but quite powerful. Much more than that, and it's too easy to turn it into a discriminatory tool :-(

Cheers,
Wol