Kuhn: Toward Civil Behavior
In the politics of Free, Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS), some people regularly engage in behavior right on that line: berating, verbal abuse, and intimidation. These behaviors are consistently tolerated, accepted, and sometimes lauded in FLOSS projects and organizations. I can report from direct experience: if you think what happens on public mailing lists is bad, what happens on the private phone calls and in-person meetings is even worse. The types of behavior that would-be leaders employ would surely shock you." (Thanks to Paul Wise)
Posted Dec 25, 2014 21:06 UTC (Thu)
by ldo (guest, #40946)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Dec 29, 2014 23:28 UTC (Mon)
by gerdesj (subscriber, #5446)
[Link] (2 responses)
Specific case
Cheers
Posted Jan 1, 2015 1:16 UTC (Thu)
by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Jan 2, 2015 0:04 UTC (Fri)
by gerdesj (subscriber, #5446)
[Link]
Don't worry though: if I see ldo pooh-poohing anything else in future, I shall be sure to pooh pooh his pooh pooh in a more forthright style.
Cheers
Posted Dec 25, 2014 23:13 UTC (Thu)
by jra (subscriber, #55261)
[Link] (1 responses)
https://www.samba.org/samba/news/articles/low_point/colum...
Posted Dec 27, 2014 0:50 UTC (Sat)
by nevets (subscriber, #11875)
[Link]
I'm sure there may be an insult here or there, but when there's something like 700 emails a day, if there's a bad comment 0.005% of the time, that means you'll see one once a month. And the only times I do see people start to insult, is when the one being insulted totally ignores all the advice they received, and continue doing the same thing over and over, when finally, being 'nice' becomes a waste of time.
Another difference between Open Source projects and proprietary, is if you have a person who ignores all the advice from the lead, and continues doing things wrong, in proprietary, projects, that person can be disciplined in several ways. Either moved to another project, suspended, or even fired. It goes both ways. There's no HR for the project leads, but there's also nothing to stop someone communicating with them from consistently doing things wrong. In proprietary work you can say, "Do that again, and you're fired", it's much harder to do that in the open source community.
I don't condone insults to people. But when it comes to only using email for communication, insulting the code itself is usually much more efficient, and gets the point across much better.
Posted Dec 26, 2014 0:46 UTC (Fri)
by pyellman (guest, #4997)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Dec 31, 2014 15:48 UTC (Wed)
by dgm (subscriber, #49227)
[Link]
Posted Dec 26, 2014 5:03 UTC (Fri)
by thedevil (guest, #32913)
[Link]
"Is it really true that any words are fair game, and nothing you can say is off-limits?"
Think about it.
It would be nice to point to examples of what to do and what not to do in this regard.
Is Linus Torvalds Considered Acceptable Or Not?
Is Linus Torvalds Considered Acceptable Or Not?
What to do: See any systemd related article you have not posted to recently
What not to do: See any systemd related article you have posted to recently
What to do: Start a lively, interesting discussion by putting the real thrust of your argument in the comment body. Ideally you don't make it personal.
What not to do: What you did in the subject line above
Jon
Is Linus Torvalds Considered Acceptable Or Not?
Is Linus Torvalds Considered Acceptable Or Not?
Jon
This isn't a new problem.
This isn't a new problem.
Kuhn: Toward Civil Behavior
Kuhn: Toward Civil Behavior
Kuhn: Toward Civil Behavior
