|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Poettering: Revisiting how we put together Linux systems

Poettering: Revisiting how we put together Linux systems

Posted Sep 2, 2014 7:21 UTC (Tue) by ringerc (subscriber, #3071)
In reply to: Poettering: Revisiting how we put together Linux systems by ringerc
Parent article: Poettering: Revisiting how we put together Linux systems

Oh, also, the sudden switch from LLVM to GCC. Switching to bash as the default shell. Changing their CIFS client. Breaking AFP support repeatedly in every release (did you know network search over AFP used to work?).

About the only highly backward compatible platforms out there are the moribund ones (Solaris, AIX, etc); FreeBSD, which makes a fair bit of effort but still breaks things occasionally; and Windows, which suffers greatly because it's so backward compatible.

Part of why OS X is so successful is *because* it breaks stuff, so it's free to change.


to post comments

Poettering: Revisiting how we put together Linux systems

Posted Sep 2, 2014 11:24 UTC (Tue) by jwakely (subscriber, #60262) [Link]

Stop it, you're not supposed to respond with facts when someone praises Mac OS X, that's not how it works.

The things that get broken probably needed to break and you should be grateful for it, you worthless non-believer.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds