Year 2038 preparations in 3.17

Posted Aug 11, 2014 14:46 UTC (Mon) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
In reply to: Year 2038 preparations in 3.17 by robbe
Parent article: Year 2038 preparations in 3.17

Yes, it's not outrageously out of range. And you might still want to have more address space than actual addressable RAM.

As far as I remember, filling 2^64 bits requires _at_ _minimum_ enough energy to boil 10 liters of water. So these computers are definitely not going to be environment-friendly.

Year 2038 preparations in 3.17

Posted Aug 11, 2014 18:13 UTC (Mon) by dlang (guest, #313) [Link]

it all depends on how frequently you are refilling that memory, and how much other useful work gets done.

There's no amount of power usage that's automatically "environmentally unfriendly"

Year 2038 preparations in 3.17

Posted Aug 17, 2014 18:03 UTC (Sun) by Jandar (subscriber, #85683) [Link]

> As far as I remember, filling 2^64 bits requires _at_ _minimum_ enough energy to boil 10 liters of water.

I recall reading in a paper that there is no lower energy limit to *filling* memory, but there is a lower energy limit to *clear* memory since clearing restores order thus lowers entropy. Maybe with enough bits we can skip clearing and save energy with write-once memory :-).