The future of realtime Linux in doubt
The future of realtime Linux in doubt
Posted Jul 10, 2014 15:05 UTC (Thu) by jch (guest, #51929)In reply to: The future of realtime Linux in doubt by PaulMcKenney
Parent article: The future of realtime Linux in doubt
After contact with the hammer, the system ceases having the realtime property.
> So if you need a real-world system that meets latency specifications of some sort, you will need a somewhat more robust definition of "real time".
No, the realtime property is only guaranteed under a given set of conditions (correct hardware, stable power supply, lack of contact with a hammer). This is no different from e.g. a filesystem only guaranteeing consistency if the hardware doesn't lie about its buffers being flushed to stable hardware.
--jch
Posted Jul 10, 2014 15:52 UTC (Thu)
by PaulMcKenney (✭ supporter ✭, #9624)
[Link]
The future of realtime Linux in doubt