|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

The future of realtime Linux in doubt

The future of realtime Linux in doubt

Posted Jul 10, 2014 15:05 UTC (Thu) by jch (guest, #51929)
In reply to: The future of realtime Linux in doubt by PaulMcKenney
Parent article: The future of realtime Linux in doubt

> I can show you a hammer that will cause it to miss its deadlines

After contact with the hammer, the system ceases having the realtime property.

> So if you need a real-world system that meets latency specifications of some sort, you will need a somewhat more robust definition of "real time".

No, the realtime property is only guaranteed under a given set of conditions (correct hardware, stable power supply, lack of contact with a hammer). This is no different from e.g. a filesystem only guaranteeing consistency if the hardware doesn't lie about its buffers being flushed to stable hardware.

--jch


to post comments

The future of realtime Linux in doubt

Posted Jul 10, 2014 15:52 UTC (Thu) by PaulMcKenney (✭ supporter ✭, #9624) [Link]

By adding those qualifiers, you are starting to add a bit of robustness to the definition. Keep moving in that direction, and you might eventually arrive at a real-world definition of real time.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds