*facepalm*
*facepalm*
Posted May 19, 2014 6:26 UTC (Mon) by Arker (guest, #14205)In reply to: *facepalm* by gmaxwell
Parent article: Firefox gets closed-source DRM
It's a different thing, it's outside the free and open web but still accessible through it, if you install the necessary compromise on your machine. All clear enough that non-technical users can, with a little effort, get a roughly accurate understanding of the situation and make their own choices accordingly.
With EME you have just blurred this to the point none of that will be true anymore. You're officially blessing this thing, in the minds of any innocent non-technical users who trust you, as part of the free and open web.
Mozilla was afraid of losing marketshare, fine. Mozilla needed to ask itself instead why it had marketshare to begin with. It was not because Firefox had the best support for Netflix!
Posted May 19, 2014 6:38 UTC (Mon)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link]
Posted May 19, 2014 7:48 UTC (Mon)
by dlang (guest, #313)
[Link]
With EME they will still have to get an external plugin from another source. Just the same way they get flash today.
The difference is that the EME plugin will be able to do a lot less than the flash plugin can do.
*facepalm*
Yes, it was because Firefox had a superior experience compared to IE6 and it was free (unlike Opera).
*facepalm*