Rise and Fall of BIND 10

Posted Apr 25, 2014 20:09 UTC (Fri) by shane (subscriber, #3335)
In reply to: Rise and Fall of BIND 10 by mathstuf
Parent article: ISC releases BIND 10 1.2, renames it, and turns it over to community

The problem with BIND 10 (now Bundy) is that there is a lot of missing functionality. :(

One of the reasons that BIND 10 had to be renamed is that it's not "Even More BIND 9" - it has quite a few differences. We had originally planned on taking a year to make a nice smooth set of conversion utilities, but had budget shortfalls and a lot of technical debt that made this impossible.

So, basically if you are a running a DNS secondary or a master authoritative server that doesn't rely on BIND 9 DNSSEC re-signing, then Bundy can probably fit your needs.

We'll see how far we are able to go with the volunteer model...

----

But I'll see if LWN is interested in an article based on the talk or just related to this topic, after I've given the presentation. :)