Debian TC vote on init system coupling
Debian TC vote on init system coupling
Posted Feb 24, 2014 20:09 UTC (Mon) by jude- (guest, #95678)In reply to: Debian TC vote on init system coupling by ewan
Parent article: Debian TC vote on init system coupling
Regarding (a), the question would be whether or not the burden of dealing with systemd is more or less than the burden of dealing with my local stuff. Right now, systemd imposes the higher burden (i.e. putting things into cgroups is trivial, but according to [1], systemd will not allow it to remain trivial). Regarding (b), there's not much of a wheel to re-invent. It's just a matter of using the appropriate cgroups commands to start a service (cgcreate, cgexec), and iterating through the cgroup's PID list to stop its processes.
[1] http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PaxContr...
Posted Feb 24, 2014 22:46 UTC (Mon)
by ovitters (guest, #27950)
[Link]
Debian TC vote on init system coupling
That's a kernel change. Something standard across distributions is IMO easier than custom stuff.