Shuttleworth: Losing graciously
Shuttleworth: Losing graciously
Posted Feb 14, 2014 16:34 UTC (Fri) by rvfh (guest, #31018)In reply to: Shuttleworth: Losing graciously by Siosm
Parent article: Shuttleworth: Losing graciously
You lost me. LTS releases are supported by Ubuntu for five years.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS for details.
Posted Feb 14, 2014 16:53 UTC (Fri)
by Siosm (subscriber, #86882)
[Link] (5 responses)
Posted Feb 14, 2014 17:01 UTC (Fri)
by palmer_eldritch (guest, #95160)
[Link]
Posted Feb 14, 2014 18:49 UTC (Fri)
by ewan (guest, #5533)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Feb 14, 2014 22:34 UTC (Fri)
by Siosm (subscriber, #86882)
[Link] (2 responses)
As much as Mark likes to point out, I'm afraid upstart is not "used" in RHEL 6 as much as he'd like it to be. Sure, it is the default init, but NONE of it's core features beyond SysVinit support are used in RHEL 6. So really, the belief that upstart is "used" by RHEL 6 is just wishful thinking.
Posted Feb 15, 2014 20:01 UTC (Sat)
by mdeslaur (subscriber, #55004)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Feb 16, 2014 3:48 UTC (Sun)
by Siosm (subscriber, #86882)
[Link]
You nailed it: there are almost no native upstart jobs in RHEL6 (tty, graphical login manager, control-alt-delete handler and that's mostly it). Thus everything is just plain init scripts. Therefore the dependency feature is not used, nor is the event feature, nor is the job lifecycle feature...
Upstart is just an intermediary to launch a massive SysVinit-like script which does all the work: /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit.
So again, no, upstart is not "used" in RHEL 6.
Shuttleworth: Losing graciously
Shuttleworth: Losing graciously
Shuttleworth: Losing graciously
Shuttleworth: Losing graciously
Shuttleworth: Losing graciously
Shuttleworth: Losing graciously
