Systemd programming part 2: activation and language issues
Systemd programming part 2: activation and language issues
Posted Feb 11, 2014 11:10 UTC (Tue) by johannbg (guest, #65743)In reply to: Systemd programming part 2: activation and language issues by zuki
Parent article: Systemd programming part 2: activation and language issues
I must say I'm a bit astound the unit creation you are proposing here on the article most notably splitting things into several targets like that and why you simply did not chose to use these unit [1] which should serve as bases for units used by upstream and distribution.
The main problem with NFS in Fedora is and always has been it's maintainer Steve which chose on several occasion to ignore comments made by upstream systemd developer ( like Kay's first comment on that bug ) submitted units and even half implement provided units ( he cherry picked units from the provided set of units which left the entire dependency chain broken ) .