Debating a "transitional" Python 2.8
Debating a "transitional" Python 2.8
Posted Jan 4, 2014 23:47 UTC (Sat) by iabervon (subscriber, #722)In reply to: Debating a "transitional" Python 2.8 by juliank
Parent article: Debating a "transitional" Python 2.8
Excellent! I'd only found a 3.0-era comparison between 2.x and 3.x, and tested on 3.2.