Debating a "transitional" Python 2.8
Debating a "transitional" Python 2.8
Posted Jan 2, 2014 23:38 UTC (Thu) by david.a.wheeler (subscriber, #72896)In reply to: Debating a "transitional" Python 2.8 by osma
Parent article: Debating a "transitional" Python 2.8
Of course it's feasible. Python has been doing it a long time, and the changes for Python3 aren't really that monumental.