Living with the surveillance state

heh, khim, still butthurt from our last encounter? ;) tell me, what is my 'crazy position'? quote my words, don't make something up as you're so wont to do. (thing is, i have not stated my position yet, only pointed out some obvious contradictions between one's words and actual actions, but i'm sure you can concoct something in your crazy mind ;).

as for the topic itself, if one doesn't value technical measures and believes in the power of some 'strong audit capability, performed out in the open' (i trust you did read the post i replied to, didn't you?) then surely disclosing addresses protected by those pointless technical measures should be fine? also not disclosing addresses is not anonimity, it's fear of getting owned (broken into) despite all those so effective social measures.