Intel and XMir
Intel and XMir
Posted Sep 12, 2013 7:41 UTC (Thu) by ovitters (guest, #27950)In reply to: Intel and XMir by maxiaojun
Parent article: Intel and XMir
I can tell you: not related at all. Just saying a bunch of things and hoping something proves you right is a pretty bad strategy to have a discussion. Please, please try to stick on topic.
Regarding "many applications": this again does not relate to the huge amount of cross distribution work they do.
Posted Sep 12, 2013 20:25 UTC (Thu)
by maxiaojun (guest, #91482)
[Link] (3 responses)
> Regarding "many applications": this again does not relate to the huge amount of cross distribution work they do.
How can you justify your claim given the fact that many applications are SLES "exclusive"? When you say "huge", how do you measure it?
I do know one key contribution from SUSE, SCIM.
It might be the king of its time, after its primary author heads to Google, it suddenly became an abandon-ware.
Then it comes IBus...
Posted Sep 12, 2013 20:29 UTC (Thu)
by ovitters (guest, #27950)
[Link] (2 responses)
If you're able to respond to a claim of mine, then fine. At the moment, you keep switching topics.
You brought up Red Hat, SuSE, The topic is XMir. If you are able to say anything relevant, cool. At the moment, you're just a mosquito.
Posted Sep 12, 2013 20:34 UTC (Thu)
by corbet (editor, #1)
[Link]
Posted Sep 12, 2013 20:34 UTC (Thu)
by maxiaojun (guest, #91482)
[Link]
If you do not bother to justify your ungrounded claims, then fine, yet another liar in FOSS world.
Intel and XMir
Intel and XMir
Perhaps both of you could stop? Please?
Intel and XMir
Intel and XMir