What's missing from our changelogs
What's missing from our changelogs
Posted Jul 25, 2013 13:02 UTC (Thu) by nevets (subscriber, #11875)In reply to: What's missing from our changelogs by aliguori
Parent article: What's missing from our changelogs
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/28/460
Which was changed to the link format of:
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<message-id>
That way we have a link to the message that you can easily find, and if you are worried about that link disappearing, you have the message-id in the link. The best of both worlds.
But you should know that Linus hates just having the message-id as a tag.
Posted Jul 25, 2013 16:58 UTC (Thu)
by aliguori (subscriber, #30636)
[Link] (5 responses)
A message-id is infinitely more useful than a link. There is no programmatic way of getting a message-id from a link so you can't generate email responses without it.
People just need to learn how to use mid.gmane.org :-)
Posted Jul 25, 2013 19:02 UTC (Thu)
by marcH (subscriber, #57642)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Jul 27, 2013 18:41 UTC (Sat)
by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Jul 26, 2013 3:02 UTC (Fri)
by nevets (subscriber, #11875)
[Link]
What's missing from our changelogs
What's missing from our changelogs
What's missing from our changelogs
I don't see the problem with the way we do the links. The link includes the message id. You get the best of both worlds.
What's missing from our changelogs