On kernel mailing list behavior
On kernel mailing list behavior
Posted Jul 19, 2013 15:46 UTC (Fri) by josh (subscriber, #17465)In reply to: On kernel mailing list behavior by corbet
Parent article: On kernel mailing list behavior
Or, in other words, yell and rant more so people don't see you as friendly. Be intimidating.
I have the same reaction to that notion that Sarah did: seriously, is *that* how we're going to put it?
Now, the problem the original thread wanted to solve made sense: patches shouldn't go into stable in preference to later -rc kernels. However, that doesn't seem like a problem best solved via ranting and raving.
So, while I didn't take Linus's joke about Greg's size as anything but a joke, in the long-standing tradition of "ha ha only serious", I do think the parallel between physical intimidation and verbal/written intimidation was entirely serious, and I think *that's* what made Sarah's mail reasonable.
Posted Jul 19, 2013 17:26 UTC (Fri)
by shmget (guest, #58347)
[Link] (1 responses)
and yet that same thread illustrate that Linux does not have the same problem than Greg, and an offender even explicitly said why: Linus would shout him down if he tried. Whereas Greg would not...
Posted Jul 22, 2013 14:47 UTC (Mon)
by bfields (subscriber, #19510)
[Link]
On kernel mailing list behavior
So 'that' does seems indeed to be quite effective to achieve the desired result.
The problem wasn't that Greg didn't "rant and rave" before, but rather (as far as I can tell) that he didn't say anything at all.
On kernel mailing list behavior