|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

On kernel mailing list behavior

On kernel mailing list behavior

Posted Jul 19, 2013 15:46 UTC (Fri) by josh (subscriber, #17465)
In reply to: On kernel mailing list behavior by corbet
Parent article: On kernel mailing list behavior

I don't think Linus was seriously advocating *violence*, but joking aside, he was most certainly drawing a parallel between the effects of being physically intimidating and being verbally intimidating. Remember that the whole point that kicked off the thread was telling Greg to be harsher so people would send him less mail and not try to get fixes into stable that should go into later -rc kernels.

Or, in other words, yell and rant more so people don't see you as friendly. Be intimidating.

I have the same reaction to that notion that Sarah did: seriously, is *that* how we're going to put it?

Now, the problem the original thread wanted to solve made sense: patches shouldn't go into stable in preference to later -rc kernels. However, that doesn't seem like a problem best solved via ranting and raving.

So, while I didn't take Linus's joke about Greg's size as anything but a joke, in the long-standing tradition of "ha ha only serious", I do think the parallel between physical intimidation and verbal/written intimidation was entirely serious, and I think *that's* what made Sarah's mail reasonable.


to post comments

On kernel mailing list behavior

Posted Jul 19, 2013 17:26 UTC (Fri) by shmget (guest, #58347) [Link] (1 responses)

"Now, the problem the original thread wanted to solve made sense: patches shouldn't go into stable in preference to later -rc kernels. However, that doesn't seem like a problem best solved via ranting and raving."

and yet that same thread illustrate that Linux does not have the same problem than Greg, and an offender even explicitly said why: Linus would shout him down if he tried. Whereas Greg would not...
So 'that' does seems indeed to be quite effective to achieve the desired result.

On kernel mailing list behavior

Posted Jul 22, 2013 14:47 UTC (Mon) by bfields (subscriber, #19510) [Link]

The problem wasn't that Greg didn't "rant and rave" before, but rather (as far as I can tell) that he didn't say anything at all.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds