On kernel mailing list behavior
On kernel mailing list behavior
Posted Jul 17, 2013 23:10 UTC (Wed) by shmget (guest, #58347)In reply to: On kernel mailing list behavior by smurf
Parent article: On kernel mailing list behavior
Please do tell which 'civil right' afford you the 'right not to be offended'
      Posted Jul 18, 2013 10:38 UTC (Thu)
                               by simosx (guest, #24338)
                              [Link] (3 responses)
       
> Please do tell which 'civil right' afford you the 'right not to be offended' 
He said that participants do not abdicate their civil rights [in general] when they join the Linux kernel development. 
And then you twist the message by asking not to go to specifics on which civil rights. ?!?!?! From point to pointless.  
     
    
      Posted Jul 18, 2013 19:01 UTC (Thu)
                               by shmget (guest, #58347)
                              [Link] (2 responses)
       
Note: I auto-corrected s/not// in the above otherwise that would not have made any sense. 
Certainly... unless that point was pure irrelevant drivel, the author intended it to be relevant to the discussion at hand... hence the question: what 'civil right' does one has to 'abdicate' to be on LKML and/or join the Kernel dev ? 
 
 
     
    
      Posted Jul 19, 2013 14:43 UTC (Fri)
                               by cloose (guest, #5066)
                              [Link] (1 responses)
       
http://dejure.org/gesetze/StGB/185.html 
Insult 
The offense is punishable with imprisonment up to one year or a fine and, if the insult is committed by means of an assault, punishable by up to two years or a fine. 
     
    
      Posted Jul 19, 2013 17:16 UTC (Fri)
                               by shmget (guest, #58347)
                              [Link] 
       
http://articles.baltimoresun.com/1994-05-23/news/19941430... 
Can wait for that level of absurdity to be enforced on LKML.... 
 
 
     
      Posted Jul 18, 2013 17:59 UTC (Thu)
                               by jmorris42 (guest, #2203)
                              [Link] (6 responses)
       
This gets right to the heart of it.  This argument is the tip of the spear, let the busybody do-gooders ever get a foot in the door and watch how fast things bog down in endless committees (complete with their own mailing lists and wikis) conferences, forums and plans to 'make the Linux and Free Software world a better, more welcoming and diverse[1] place.'  Until all actual work stops. 
[1] Diverse in the PC sense of course.  Where everyone of every race, color, gender identity and (approved) religion comes together in perfect harmony to utterly stamp out any dissenting opinion.  Because the one diversity that is forbidden is diversity of thought. 
     
    
      Posted Jul 18, 2013 21:57 UTC (Thu)
                               by nix (subscriber, #2304)
                              [Link] (3 responses)
       
In not one was this implemented via 'endless committees', nor was it true that 'everyone of every race, color, gender identity and (approved) religion [came] together in perfect harmony to utterly stamp out any dissenting opinion. Because the one diversity that is forbidden is diversity of thought'. 
I find it astonishing that you believe that being asked to not be horrible to people is equivalent to some sort of police state! 
 
     
    
      Posted Jul 19, 2013 0:00 UTC (Fri)
                               by Tobu (subscriber, #24111)
                              [Link] (1 responses)
       Being offended is entirely up to the person being offended, and doesn't have to be motivated by actual insults.  It shouldn't be surprising that being offended and making a spectacle of it has become way more popular than insulting people; it's just as nasty to interpersonal relationships, and way less risky.
 
     
    
      Posted Jul 19, 2013 0:17 UTC (Fri)
                               by rgmoore (✭ supporter ✭, #75)
                              [Link] 
       [Citation Needed]
 I've certainly seen a lot more nasty insults from LKML- the arena under discussion- than claims of being offended.
      
           
     
      Posted Jul 19, 2013 2:51 UTC (Fri)
                               by ajf (guest, #10844)
                              [Link] 
       
     
      Posted Jul 18, 2013 23:50 UTC (Thu)
                               by brianomahoney (guest, #6206)
                              [Link] (1 responses)
       
     
    
      Posted Jul 19, 2013 0:25 UTC (Fri)
                               by corbet (editor, #1)
                              [Link] 
       
     
    On kernel mailing list behavior
      
On kernel mailing list behavior
      
And in particular, since when the 'right not to be offended' is a 'civil _right_' ?
On kernel mailing list behavior
      
On kernel mailing list behavior
      
On kernel mailing list behavior
      
On kernel mailing list behavior
      
On kernel mailing list behavior
      On kernel mailing list behavior
      It shouldn't be surprising that being offended and making a spectacle of it has become way more popular than insulting people
On kernel mailing list behavior
      I find it astonishing that you believe that being asked to not be horrible to people is equivalent to some sort of police state!
Oh my god, that’s treating other people with respect gone mad!
      
          On kernel mailing list behavior
      
      I will say this once only.  Desist immediately.  You are the one without anything to add to the conversation, and this kind of comment is not welcome here.
      
          On kernel mailing list behavior
      
           