Re: [GFD] OFL-FAQ update draft and web fonts paper
[Posted May 30, 2013 by n8willis]
| From: |
| Dave Crossland <dave-yX7OcqChgmE-AT-public.gmane.org> |
| To: |
| googlefontdirectory-discuss-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw-AT-public.gmane.org |
| Subject: |
| Re: [GFD] OFL-FAQ update draft and web fonts paper |
| Date: |
| Wed, 22 May 2013 22:47:23 +0200 |
| Message-ID: |
| <CAEozd0x4CNtA3bRoD=LZODKZrj5vNGC-G=5TPoGEfg06FvQ8hQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Cc: |
| Open Font Library <openfontlibrary-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW-AT-public.gmane.org> |
On 22 May 2013 22:41, Vernon Adams <vern-nztp2eEOrCR84o+VKJ9KNPXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Any chance you can give an 'idiots guide' on how a trademark license
> would preserved some of the effects of the RFN? I'm unsure how
> and when this trademark license would work? What would it be
> aimed at preventing?
If you have no RFN, someone can make subsets (yay) but also release
Oswald Serif without additional permission (hmm) - but if you have a
trademark, they can subset Oswald but can't release Oswald Serif.
Please consider
http://svn-qavm.apache.org/repos/svn-org/trunk/legal/trad...
