So few TPM users
So few TPM users
Posted May 8, 2013 10:38 UTC (Wed) by kbengston (guest, #6153)Parent article: Garrett: A short introduction to TPMs
Posted May 8, 2013 10:49 UTC (Wed)
by lindi (subscriber, #53135)
[Link]
Posted May 8, 2013 20:59 UTC (Wed)
by rahvin (guest, #16953)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted May 8, 2013 22:16 UTC (Wed)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link]
I've used them in past (in medical industry) for remote attestation on trusted boots to make sure that servers are physically secure.
Posted May 8, 2013 22:17 UTC (Wed)
by luto (guest, #39314)
[Link]
The ChromeOS people have a project called "trunks" that's rather special-purpose but avoids relying on trousers.
Shameless plug: My tpmkey project has been languishing. Eventually I'll spruce it up and make it awesome. Anyone want to help?
Posted May 16, 2013 12:10 UTC (Thu)
by phred14 (guest, #60633)
[Link]
I've been interested for some time now about actually using one of these TPMs for my own security purposes. One of these days, maybe...
So few TPM users
So few TPM users
So few TPM users
The relevant data is freely available. I've used it, and it's actually not completely awful. What is rather awful is the officially sanctioned API between the various components of the software stack (e.g. TSPI). What's even worse is the undocumented TCP-based protocol that client software uses to talk to the trousers daemon.
So few TPM users
So few TPM users
