|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

An idea About the Thames Tideway Tunnel

An idea About the Thames Tideway Tunnel

Posted Apr 24, 2013 14:41 UTC (Wed) by tialaramex (subscriber, #21167)
In reply to: An idea About the Thames Tideway Tunnel by khim
Parent article: Huang: The $12 Gongkai Phone

The summary is that yes, it's a net win. If you build a new city today (and indeed when new cities were built in the mid 20th century onward) combined sewers are not normally used. Rain water from gutters and pavements flows into storm sewers and both the "black water" (human waste) and "grey water" (washing machines, baths, etc.) go into the sanitary sewers which lead to a treatment plant.

In principle "separating" London's sewers isn't impossible. But it would be prohibitively expensive. Some US cities have done it, but we're not talking about New York or Los Angeles here, but rather places like Minneapolis - scarcely comparable to London in either size or density.


to post comments

An idea About the Thames Tideway Tunnel

Posted Apr 28, 2013 14:00 UTC (Sun) by foom (subscriber, #14868) [Link]

Boston has been working on it for a few decades now. I think the reason it's desirable to separate them is that if you need to overflow, it's much better to overflow rainwater than sewage, even if you normally want to treat both.

http://www.mwra.state.ma.us/03sewer/html/sewcso.htm


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds