What's an order of magnitude among friends?
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
Posted Jan 31, 2013 4:56 UTC (Thu) by dlang (guest, #313)In reply to: What's an order of magnitude among friends? by raven667
Parent article: Quotes of the week
but the price premium that it would have would not be worth it.
Posted Jan 31, 2013 15:29 UTC (Thu)
by marduk (subscriber, #3831)
[Link] (15 responses)
Posted Jan 31, 2013 17:05 UTC (Thu)
by drag (guest, #31333)
[Link] (13 responses)
Going from that I figure a 72k rpm disk would make a nice sharp ZZzzz-ng noise as it explodes and shrapnel zips past (hopefully) your head.
Posted Jan 31, 2013 20:51 UTC (Thu)
by rgmoore (✭ supporter ✭, #75)
[Link] (12 responses)
Bullets are not known for their rugged construction; in many cases it's considered desirable if the bullet breaks up on impact so it can dump its kinetic energy more efficiently. Devices that are intended to operate at 72K RPM and above are certainly practical. Many of the machines I work with have turbomolecular pumps that operate in that speed range, and their diameter is larger than a disk drive so the force is larger as well. Similarly, ultracentrifuges operate at substantially higher speed than that- they can go above 100K RPM- without exploding. The thing they have in common is that they operate under vacuum to minimize friction. I suspect an ultra-high speed disk drive would need to do the same. As long as the vacuum is maintained, they would probably be pretty quiet. The motors would tend to give off a ~1200 Hz (e.g. 72K cycle per minute) whine.
Posted Feb 2, 2013 18:25 UTC (Sat)
by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
Posted Feb 2, 2013 18:27 UTC (Sat)
by Tet (guest, #5433)
[Link] (1 responses)
You don't even need that. Most turbos routinely spin in excess of 100K RPM without needing a vacuum, and the Honda CX-500 had a turbo that spun at 200K RPM. Pretty insane, but it worked.
Posted Feb 8, 2013 0:16 UTC (Fri)
by dfsmith (guest, #20302)
[Link]
Posted Feb 13, 2013 22:17 UTC (Wed)
by Lennie (subscriber, #49641)
[Link] (8 responses)
So this isn't an alien concept to producers of harddisks.
Posted Feb 14, 2013 17:58 UTC (Thu)
by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link] (7 responses)
Posted Feb 14, 2013 19:49 UTC (Thu)
by Lennie (subscriber, #49641)
[Link] (5 responses)
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/09/hel...
The register mentions some more about the advantages and specifications:
Posted Feb 15, 2013 18:13 UTC (Fri)
by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link] (4 responses)
Posted Feb 20, 2013 0:49 UTC (Wed)
by man_ls (guest, #15091)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Feb 21, 2013 21:11 UTC (Thu)
by mikewd (subscriber, #46016)
[Link] (2 responses)
The problem is that the diffusion rate of helium through glass or epoxy and other glues and insulators can be quite high at room temperature (as a low temperature physicist well knows). So the container needs to be all metal with a soldered or welded seal.
Mike
Posted Feb 22, 2013 10:28 UTC (Fri)
by khim (subscriber, #9252)
[Link] (1 responses)
Well, we are talking HDDs here. They used "all metal" containers for decades now anyway. Usually they had some filters and were not welded shut, but that is minor change IMO.
Posted Feb 22, 2013 18:12 UTC (Fri)
by magila (guest, #49627)
[Link]
Making all of these openings impermeable to He is not a minor change and will likely significantly increase the cost of the drive.
Posted Feb 14, 2013 23:43 UTC (Thu)
by dlang (guest, #313)
[Link]
Posted Feb 1, 2013 16:49 UTC (Fri)
by felixfix (subscriber, #242)
[Link]
Posted Feb 4, 2013 9:45 UTC (Mon)
by pr1268 (guest, #24648)
[Link] (1 responses)
Indeed. The (now retired) NASA Space Shuttle Main Engine high-pressure oxidizer turbopump spun at 28,120 RPM, and the H.P. fuel turbopump spun at 35,360 RPM. Each of these was around 10 times the dimensions of a typical computer spinning hard drive. Of course, there isn't an actuator arm with a magnetic pickup anywhere near those pumps! Back to the article, while I do admire Daniel's work on Tux3, I'm wondering if the fast I/O speeds of SSDs will render all the optimization work done to FSCK a moot point?
Posted Feb 8, 2013 0:51 UTC (Fri)
by daniel (guest, #3181)
[Link]
Posted Feb 4, 2013 13:36 UTC (Mon)
by man_ls (guest, #15091)
[Link]
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
The motors would tend to give off a ~1200 Hz (e.g. 72K cycle per minute) whine.
Right around the human hearing frequency optimum, and right in the range critical for comprehension of human speech.
they can go above 100K RPM- without exploding. The thing they have in common is that they operate under vacuum to minimize friction
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
Helium is the second most inert of all gases so it is not hard to contain. Hydrogen (as said below) or even liquid helium (as you can read on the wikipedia) are harder. With helium gas you just seal the container and it just stays there, without condensing or interacting with the walls or other gases; it shouldn't be harder than creating a vacuum.
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
So the container needs to be all metal with a soldered or welded seal.
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
Well, a 72 KRPM disk might double as a flywheel energy storage and take the place of the UPS too. Handling it in operation would certainly be awkward due to the centrifugal forces inside it -- if you have ever handled a Powerball (rotating gyroscope toy) you know what I mean.
What's an order of magnitude among friends?
