the point is that this violates the charter for -stable

Posted Jan 22, 2013 20:46 UTC (Tue) by corbet (editor, #1)
In reply to: the point is that this violates the charter for -stable by dlang
Parent article: Long-term support initiative 3.4 kernel released

LTSI was never meant to be a stable branch; it is an independent kernel maintained for a specific industry. The inclusion of backported features and such was always part of the plan. The hope is to at least get various vendors working from the same kernel with added goodies and part of the process of getting them closer to upstream.