|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Canon legal response

Canon legal response

Posted Jan 14, 2013 19:04 UTC (Mon) by harold (guest, #44046)
In reply to: Canon legal response by n8willis
Parent article: Testing Magic Lantern 2.3

Canon Rumours says the biggest change is the heat sink inside the camera to keep the sensor circuitry cool during 4K video operation.


to post comments

Canon legal response

Posted Jan 15, 2013 15:28 UTC (Tue) by n8willis (subscriber, #43041) [Link]

But CR didn't get to inspect (or much less teardown) the hardware; they only said that they could see the heatsink difference (and along with other unidentified changes) after being shown the camera by a Canon rep. There is a lot of room for different circuitry changes that are not visible or obvious to the unaided eye; I don't know how many "initial reports" I've read about Android devices that turn out to be wrong months later about important things like whether or not there is a Bluetooth chip or if the USB charging port is power-only or has data lines.

You just don't know until you can break it into little pieces with your own two hands. Doubly so for hardware that's still unreleased.
Nate


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds