Nit: dot in dot com,
Nit: dot in dot com,
Posted Oct 4, 2003 9:15 UTC (Sat) by rise (guest, #5045)In reply to: Nit: dot in dot com, by Baylink
Parent article: After Sun goes out (NewsForge)
Actually VeriSign runs the .com and .net GTLD servers, the roots are still run by a mess of independent cooperating organizations (of which VeriSign is only one). For example f.root-servers.net is run by the ISC as a distributed virtual server, M by the WIDE project in Tokyo and K by RIPE out of London and Amsterdam. See http://www.root-servers.org/ for all the gory/interesting details. Thanks, by the way, for explaining the null label - after it surfaced in conversation last night I was surprised to note that some very clueful people had no idea it existed.
Posted Oct 6, 2003 16:12 UTC (Mon)
by Baylink (guest, #755)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Oct 18, 2003 17:18 UTC (Sat)
by shane (subscriber, #3335)
[Link]
The K root now runs Dell PC's.
I'd fallen off the domain lists (when Verisign yanked them with no Nit: dot in dot com,
notice to avoid litigation some years back); things are less ugly than
I'd thought; thanks.
But to reply to wcooley, no, I don't think that it was ever true that all
the root servers ran on Sun hardware either... I'm fairly sure that
ISC's, in particular, does not.
I can't speak about other roots, but the RIPE NCC's root server (K) ran on Sun boxes for a few months only. The fact is they were too slow to keep up with the load immediately after going on-line. Admittedly this is a failure of the organisation to properly benchmark the hardware required, but it is also not a ringing endorsement of Sun either. ;)Sun on the roots
