A report from the first Korea Linux Forum
to foster a stronger relationship between South Korea and the global Linux development community". In truth, South Korea is already a strong presence in this community; arguably KLF was more of a recognition and celebration of that relationship. In any case, one conclusion was clear: there is a lot going on in this part of the world.
Some years ago, the Open Source Development Laboratories recognized that Japanese companies were increasingly making use of Linux but were not always participating in the development community. To help close the loop, OSDL began a series of events where Japanese developers could hear from — and talk with — developers from the wider community; that practice continued into the Linux Foundation era. Your editor was lucky enough to be able to attend a number of these events, starting in 2007. These conferences cannot claim all of the credit for the marked increase in contributions from Japan over the last several years, but it seems clear that they helped. The Japanese Linux Symposium has since transformed into LinuxCon Japan, a proper development conference in its own right.
KLF is clearly meant to follow the same pattern, but there is a big
difference this time around: community participation from Korea is already
significant and
increasing in a big way. For example, Samsung first appeared in the list
of top kernel contributors in the 2.6.35
development cycle over two years ago; it has held its place on that list
ever since. Contributions from Korean developers are clearly not in short
supply. That made the job of the KLF speakers easy; rather than
encouraging Korean developers to participate more, they were able to offer
their thanks and talk more about how to get things done in the community.
The first talk (after the inevitable cheerleading session by Linux Foundation head Jim Zemlin) was by Samsung vice president Wonjoo Park; his goal was to make it clear that Linux is an important resource for Samsung, the "host sponsor" for the event as a whole. Software, he said, is the means for product differentiation in today's market; it is the most important part of any product and drives the business as a whole. Samsung, it seems, is a software company.
The company got its start with Linux in 2003, using a distribution from MontaVista. Use of Linux expanded over the years: appliances in 2005, televisions in 2006, and so on. Samsung's first Linux smartphone came out in 2004; it featured a voice-activated phone book. In 2007 Samsung joined LiMo; the first LiMo-based phone came out in 2009. In 2012, products all across the Samsung line, from phones and tablets to home theater systems, cameras and printers, are all based on Linux.
Now, of course, much of the company's efforts are going into furthering the Tizen distribution. He mentioned the recently-posted F2FS filesystem: Samsung could have held onto that code and kept F2FS proprietary, he said, but that would have deterred innovation; sharing it, instead, allows the company to accept changes from others. Samsung has also put together an extensive license compliance process after a "rough start" that forced the company to apologize to the community. One of the results is opensource.samsung.com, one-stop shopping for the source code for Samsung's products.
In summary, he said, Linux has become a "core competitive competence" for Samsung; the company would not be able to do what it does without it.
Korean rockstar hacker Tejun Heo gave a well-received keynote presentation
on what it is like to be a community developer. It is hard, he said, but
then, working in Korean companies, where the expectations are high, is hard
in general. Developers
who can succeed in the corporate setting can make it in the community as
well. Developing in the community has a lot of rewards, including the fact
that credit for the work stays with the developer rather than accruing to
the sponsoring company. It is a challenging path, but full of benefits.
KLF was, like the early Japan events, oriented toward information delivery rather than the sort of critical discussion of ongoing work that one finds at a serious development conference. That does not mean that there was no development work on display, though. Arguably the most interesting talk was Kisoo Yu's discussion of the big.LITTLE switcher (originally written by Nicolas Pitre). Big.LITTLE is an ARM-based system-on-chip architecture that combines a number of slow, power-efficient processors with fast, power-hungry processors on the same chip. In this particular case, Kisoo discussed an upcoming Samsung Exynos processor combining four Cortex A7 processors with four Cortex A15's — yes, an eight-core SoC.
Big.LITTLE poses a number of interesting challenges for the kernel: how does one schedule tasks across the system to optimize both throughput and power consumption? Kisoo described two approaches, the first of which involves running Linux under a simple hypervisor that transparently switches the hardware from slow mode (running on all four A7's) to fast mode (all four A15's) without the kernel's participation or awareness. The alternative approach has the kernel itself explicitly managing the SoC as a four-processor system, switching each one independently between the fast and slow cores as if it were simply adjusting the CPU's clock frequency. Either way, a number of heuristics have been developed to try to determine the best time to make the switch from one to the other. This SoC offers an interesting hardware feature that can quickly transfer interesting L2 cache entries from one core to another to speed the switching process, which can be done in 30µs or so.
Perhaps the most interesting takeaway from the talk is that we still don't really have a good idea for how to manage these systems. This SoC is a true eight-core processor; it would seem that an optimal approach would manage it as such rather than as a four-core system with a big "turbo" button. The fact that we are, thus far, unable to do so is not an indictment of the developers working on the task in any way; it is clearly a hard problem without much in the way of useful solutions in the literature. As is the case with many other hard operating system problems, the work being done now will get us closer to an understanding of the issues and the eventual development of better solutions.
One thing that became clear at the inaugural KLF is that Korea is
increasingly supplying a lot of sharp minds ready to work on problems like
this, and that this trend looks set to continue indefinitely. Energy
abounds, as does, seemingly, a good sense of fun. Your editor
would like to thank our hosts in Korea for hosting an engaging event,
treating us so well, and even for inflicting "Gangnam style" K-pop music on
us at the conference dinner. And, of course, thanks are due to the Linux
Foundation for supporting your editor's travel to the event.
| Index entries for this article | |
|---|---|
| Kernel | big.LITTLE |
| Conference | Korea Linux Forum/2012 |
Posted Oct 16, 2012 23:52 UTC (Tue)
by ksoonson (guest, #2730)
[Link]
Posted Oct 18, 2012 4:02 UTC (Thu)
by pabs (subscriber, #43278)
[Link]
Posted Oct 18, 2012 17:52 UTC (Thu)
by iabervon (subscriber, #722)
[Link]
Posted Oct 25, 2012 9:20 UTC (Thu)
by Duncan (guest, #6647)
[Link]
With this article I now have an image to match the name and respect with. =:^)
(Meanwhile, I see I wasn't the only one to be amused by the KLF namespace clash. I feel a bit like a "Justified Ancient of Mumu" myself, referring to it. Meanwhile, "Gangnam Style"'s fun and I definitely appreciate good natured fun at one's own expense, but it could never replace that "Last train to Trancentral" (tho it's a bus in this area), the missing of which can indeed seem pretty "Eternal".)
Duncan
A report from the first Korea Linux Forum
A report from the first Korea Linux Forum
A report from the first Korea Linux Forum
A report from the first Korea Linux Forum
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47301
