How different from RC5
How different from RC5
Posted Oct 1, 2003 16:35 UTC (Wed) by rknop (guest, #66)Parent article: OpenOffice.org 1.1 released
I downloaded RC5 a few days ago. Is this just RC5 renamed, or did any bugs get fixed? (I'm wondering if it's worth the redownload or not.)
-Rob
Posted Oct 1, 2003 16:43 UTC (Wed)
by alspnost (guest, #2763)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Oct 1, 2003 18:37 UTC (Wed)
by captrb (guest, #2291)
[Link]
Posted Oct 2, 2003 13:14 UTC (Thu)
by barrydavies (guest, #5372)
[Link]
Posted Oct 1, 2003 16:57 UTC (Wed)
by gbailey (subscriber, #58)
[Link]
Posted Oct 2, 2003 13:27 UTC (Thu)
by cross (guest, #13601)
[Link]
Fair question - I couldn't find an actual changelog anywhere. But anyway, I can't imagine that anything changed since RC5, and if you're not encountering any problems, it certainly isn't worth another 60MB download! I'm still running RC2 at home, with no bugs biting me so far....
How different from RC5
How different from RC5
That's irritating. OpenOffice.org doesn't seem to follow traditional
release conventions. The Eclipse project seems to have the same issue.
I guess I'm not surprised, though, considering their respective origins.
How different from RC5
http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/1.1.0/release_notes_1.1.html
Looks like it's RC5 renamed:
How different from RC5
$ gunzip -Nl OOo_1.1.0_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz
compressed uncompressed ratio uncompressed_name
78347712 81459200 3.8% Oo_1.1rc5_LinuxIntel_install.tar
No differences. Just did a diff on the two unpacked trees to make sure.How different from RC5