Tolerance
Tolerance
Posted Aug 15, 2012 17:57 UTC (Wed) by corbet (editor, #1)In reply to: Tolerance by rahvin
Parent article: Aurora: DEFCON: Why conference harassment matters
That's probably a worthwhile addition, yes.
I've also been pondering ways of altering the presentation of comments posted by people who are being filtered by a lot of people. The account in question here is currently #2 on the list.
Posted Aug 15, 2012 18:11 UTC (Wed)
by edomaur (subscriber, #14520)
[Link]
Posted Aug 15, 2012 19:28 UTC (Wed)
by fracek (guest, #85785)
[Link]
Trolls can still post but only other hell banned people can see them. In this way they won't signup again because they were banned.
Posted Aug 15, 2012 19:41 UTC (Wed)
by man_ls (guest, #15091)
[Link]
Posted Aug 15, 2012 22:36 UTC (Wed)
by andresfreund (subscriber, #69562)
[Link]
Posted Aug 16, 2012 21:23 UTC (Thu)
by biged (guest, #50106)
[Link]
On a social/human level, a time-limited ban has been found effective on at least one site. It helps reform behaviour of those who are merely ignorant rather than wilfully misbehaving.
It's certainly worth expending some effort on this: LWN comment quality is one of the major features of the site, and as you start to lose the battle the ones misbehaving increasingly get the feeling their behaviour is tolerated or even appreciated. This is a slippery slope, and only LWN features can fix it.
Tolerance
Tolerance
I would humbly suggest a "report abuse" button; check three violations of the "polite, respectful" rule, ban the user. It is not censorship but ostracism.
Tolerance
Tolerance
That makes it harder to really ignore subthreads started by $troll which probably leads to more answers and thus more fun for the troll.
Tolerance