Atime and btrfs: a bad combination?
Atime and btrfs: a bad combination?
Posted Jun 1, 2012 9:41 UTC (Fri) by bergwolf (guest, #55931)In reply to: Atime and btrfs: a bad combination? by jzbiciak
Parent article: Atime and btrfs: a bad combination?
Enabling atime on per file/directory basis sounds good. mutt is already broken anyway in case of relatime mount. Adding such an interface would allow applications like mutt to work again without having to tweak whole file system performance.
Posted Jun 5, 2012 10:25 UTC (Tue)
by mgedmin (subscriber, #34497)
[Link]
Atime and btrfs: a bad combination?
How is Mutt broken by relatime? I'm using it this way every day, with mbox files on ext4 mounted with relatime. New mail notification works reliably.