|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Atime and btrfs: a bad combination?

Atime and btrfs: a bad combination?

Posted Jun 1, 2012 8:39 UTC (Fri) by geertj (guest, #4116)
Parent article: Atime and btrfs: a bad combination?

Maybe atime could be updated in-place, if atime is the only metadata update to an inode? The implication would be that atime in snapshots would change. But maybe that's something that could be accepted as a compromise?


to post comments

Atime and btrfs: a bad combination?

Posted Jun 1, 2012 9:43 UTC (Fri) by bergwolf (guest, #55931) [Link]

Updating atime in a snapshot breaks its design and is dangerous if snapshot is taken for backup purpose.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds