|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Re: [PATCH/RFC net-next 0/4] Delete token ring support.

From:  David Miller <davem-AT-davemloft.net>
To:  andi-AT-firstfloor.org
Subject:  Re: [PATCH/RFC net-next 0/4] Delete token ring support.
Date:  Tue, 15 May 2012 21:00:20 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID:  <20120515.210020.1631343759962418692.davem@davemloft.net>
Cc:  paul.gortmaker-AT-windriver.com, netdev-AT-vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky-AT-de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens-AT-de.ibm.com, linux390-AT-de.ibm.com, linux-s390-AT-vger.kernel.org
Archive‑link:  Article

From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 17:48:15 -0700

> Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> writes:
>>
>> What I mean by (2) is the implicit absence of anyone fixing _runtime_
>> bugs, going all the way back to 2.6.12 in 2005.  If the code was being
>> _used_, we'd see runtime regressions reported and their associated
>> fixes.
> 
> Removal sounds good to me. In fact I would argue to remove any other driver
> which did not get a real change since 2005 too.

I also support removing the token ring stuff, and in fact I'm more
than happy to add your patch set to the net-next tree right now.



to post comments


Copyright © 2012, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds