Re: [PATCH/RFC net-next 0/4] Delete token ring support.
[Posted May 16, 2012 by corbet]
From: |
| David Miller <davem-AT-davemloft.net> |
To: |
| andi-AT-firstfloor.org |
Subject: |
| Re: [PATCH/RFC net-next 0/4] Delete token ring support. |
Date: |
| Tue, 15 May 2012 21:00:20 -0400 (EDT) |
Message-ID: |
| <20120515.210020.1631343759962418692.davem@davemloft.net> |
Cc: |
| paul.gortmaker-AT-windriver.com, netdev-AT-vger.kernel.org,
schwidefsky-AT-de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens-AT-de.ibm.com,
linux390-AT-de.ibm.com, linux-s390-AT-vger.kernel.org |
Archive‑link: | |
Article |
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 17:48:15 -0700
> Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> writes:
>>
>> What I mean by (2) is the implicit absence of anyone fixing _runtime_
>> bugs, going all the way back to 2.6.12 in 2005. If the code was being
>> _used_, we'd see runtime regressions reported and their associated
>> fixes.
>
> Removal sounds good to me. In fact I would argue to remove any other driver
> which did not get a real change since 2005 too.
I also support removing the token ring stuff, and in fact I'm more
than happy to add your patch set to the net-next tree right now.