|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

A bcache update

A bcache update

Posted May 16, 2012 1:52 UTC (Wed) by koverstreet (✭ supporter ✭, #4296)
In reply to: A bcache update by intgr
Parent article: A bcache update

Well, you want the sequential writes to bypass the cache, which is what bcache does.

If you can show me a workload that'd benefit though - I'm not opposed to the idea, it's just a question of priorities.


to post comments

A bcache update

Posted May 16, 2012 7:35 UTC (Wed) by intgr (subscriber, #39733) [Link]

> Well, you want the sequential writes to bypass the cache, which is what bcache does

Oh, I didn't realize that. That should take care of most of it. There's probably still some benefit to sorting writeback by size, but I'm not sure whether it's worth the complexity.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds