systemd & the tightly couple core band vs a world of many inits
systemd & the tightly couple core band vs a world of many inits
Posted Apr 27, 2012 2:36 UTC (Fri) by cas (guest, #52554)In reply to: systemd & the tightly couple core band vs a world of many inits by ovitters
Parent article: Shuttleworth: Quality has a new name
If you don't like me saying that "software package X is crap, and here are some of the reasons why" then DON'T READ ANYTHING I POST, but don't insist that I conform to YOUR standards as if they are some universal objective standard of correct behaviour.
2. it is you who are turning things around. you said words to the effect of "be nice as i define it or i won't listen to you" - this is a repulsively passive-aggressive form of attempted censorship. I said "why should i care if you listen to me or not?". you still haven't provided any reason why i should care and seem to be going out of your way to provide reasons why i shouldn't.
3. Don't bother me again with this tedious garbage. i'm not interested.
some days i really wish forums like this had a killfile.
Posted Apr 27, 2012 2:43 UTC (Fri)
by sfeam (subscriber, #2841)
[Link]
"some days i really wish forums like this had a killfile."systemd & the tightly couple core band vs a world of many inits
It does. You're now in it.
