|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

systemd & the tightly couple core band vs a world of many inits

systemd & the tightly couple core band vs a world of many inits

Posted Apr 24, 2012 22:51 UTC (Tue) by HelloWorld (guest, #56129)
In reply to: systemd & the tightly couple core band vs a world of many inits by dlang
Parent article: Shuttleworth: Quality has a new name

> yes, but it's one that sysadmins are very familiar with. They need it and use it for all sort of other things so your objection really doesn't matter.
Oh, it very much does. Writing sh scripts is much harder than writing simple ini-style configuration files even if you know sh. And actually, many admins know it barely enough to somehow get by. When did you last meet a sysadmin who knows the difference between cat << EOF and cat << "EOF"?


to post comments

systemd & the tightly couple core band vs a world of many inits

Posted Apr 25, 2012 12:36 UTC (Wed) by sciurus (guest, #58832) [Link]

Variable interpolation. Don't underestimate the sysadmin's ability to memorize arcana. :-)

systemd & the tightly couple core band vs a world of many inits

Posted Apr 26, 2012 19:22 UTC (Thu) by cdmiller (guest, #2813) [Link]

Hmm, that would be every sysadmin in our shop, including the primary Windows server admin.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds