|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

systemd & the tightly couple core band vs a world of many inits

systemd & the tightly couple core band vs a world of many inits

Posted Apr 24, 2012 21:05 UTC (Tue) by dlang (guest, #313)
In reply to: systemd & the tightly couple core band vs a world of many inits by drag
Parent article: Shuttleworth: Quality has a new name

> you end up with a overabundance of capabilities, which is almost never a bad thing.

This overabundance of capabilities brings a significant amount of additional complexity along with it, which is almost never a good thing.

Add to it the fact that a lot of these tools try _really_ hard to do what a desktop user would want them to do, and it can frequently be hard to get them to _not_ do that and instead do what you need them to do.


to post comments

systemd & the tightly couple core band vs a world of many inits

Posted Apr 25, 2012 15:35 UTC (Wed) by drag (guest, #31333) [Link]

> This overabundance of capabilities brings a significant amount of additional complexity along with it, which is almost never a good thing.

But it is necessary complexity in many regards.

Either you have it done in systemd or you find some other mechanism to do it.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds