They should be paying attention to the lumberjack project
They should be paying attention to the lumberjack project
Posted Apr 13, 2012 23:33 UTC (Fri) by ebiederm (subscriber, #35028)In reply to: They should be paying attention to the lumberjack project by dlang
Parent article: Toward more reliable logging
Call me dense but it looks to me like the problem of structured logging have already solved and standardized.
Posted Apr 14, 2012 1:08 UTC (Sat)
by dlang (guest, #313)
[Link] (4 responses)
Posted Apr 16, 2012 6:21 UTC (Mon)
by quotemstr (subscriber, #45331)
[Link] (3 responses)
Having more structure than that adds too much complexity to be worthwhile. You can approximate structure using keys.with.dots or numbers --- e.g., filename1=foo filename2=bar. Hierarchy adds far more complexity to makes indexing and browsing, very common cases, than it adds to the very rare log message with repeated units.
Can you give me an example of a situation in which hierarchical logging is clearly better than key-value pairs?
Posted Apr 16, 2012 6:30 UTC (Mon)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link]
And I don't really see how hierarchical data makes logging more complex. If you don't care about it, then simply ignore it.
Posted Apr 17, 2012 16:34 UTC (Tue)
by k8to (guest, #15413)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Apr 17, 2012 16:36 UTC (Tue)
by quotemstr (subscriber, #45331)
[Link]
Posted Apr 14, 2012 23:27 UTC (Sat)
by dlang (guest, #313)
[Link]
They should be paying attention to the lumberjack project
They should be paying attention to the lumberjack project
They should be paying attention to the lumberjack project
They should be paying attention to the lumberjack project
They should be paying attention to the lumberjack project
They should be paying attention to the lumberjack project