Greg Kroah-Hartman moves to the Linux Foundation
In his role as Linux Foundation Fellow, Kroah-Hartman will continue his work as the maintainer for the Linux stable kernel branch and a variety of subsystems while working in a fully neutral environment. He will also work more closely with Linux Foundation members, workgroups, Labs projects, and staff on key initiatives to advance Linux."
Posted Feb 1, 2012 15:20 UTC (Wed)
by dmarti (subscriber, #11625)
[Link] (7 responses)
Congratulations, Greg, and enjoy the new job.
Posted Feb 1, 2012 16:44 UTC (Wed)
by kragilkragil2 (guest, #76172)
[Link] (5 responses)
Anyways, congrats!
Posted Feb 1, 2012 18:35 UTC (Wed)
by mbar (guest, #73813)
[Link]
Posted Feb 2, 2012 9:26 UTC (Thu)
by stumbles (guest, #8796)
[Link]
Posted Feb 2, 2012 11:17 UTC (Thu)
by jengelh (guest, #33263)
[Link]
The Andrew Morton of the 2010s.. :)
Posted Feb 2, 2012 15:33 UTC (Thu)
by david.a.wheeler (subscriber, #72896)
[Link] (1 responses)
I wish the very best to Greg K-H. He manages to do a remarkable amount of work that helps us all.
I agree that he does too much to be just one ordinary person, but I had always assumed he has a time-turner.
Posted Feb 3, 2012 20:12 UTC (Fri)
by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
Posted Feb 2, 2012 0:34 UTC (Thu)
by jospoortvliet (guest, #33164)
[Link]
He is a great guy who does instead of talks. He has promised to stay around in openSUSE and I'm really glad he said that.
Posted Feb 2, 2012 16:33 UTC (Thu)
by ds2horner (subscriber, #13438)
[Link] (3 responses)
But how can one say LF is "a fully neutral environment"? And even if that were so by some definition, how can that be billed as an "always good thing" TM? As best I can tell, vested interest have always provided motivation for improvements in Linux.
The statement is a step up from the previous self assertion: "The Linux Foundation provides a neutral forum for collaboration and education by hosting technical events".
Is this an example of neutrality creep or of some neutrality creep?
I couldn't find this question addressed in other responses (my search did come up with that quote on LF), but if this is has already been discussed here I'm interested in a link.
Thanks.
Posted Feb 2, 2012 22:01 UTC (Thu)
by dlang (guest, #313)
[Link] (2 responses)
LF has since hired additional folks, but the intent seems to be the same.
If these people worked for Red Hat, then statements by Red Hat Management would be viewed as having more influence on development directions than they really do.
The same thing goes the other way. Just look at all the flames directed at Sony because one of their employees decided to contribute to toybox, even though there are probably fewer than a half dozen people in Sony who even knew that that employee was doing so.
Posted Feb 10, 2012 12:10 UTC (Fri)
by jospoortvliet (guest, #33164)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Feb 10, 2012 16:13 UTC (Fri)
by gregkh (subscriber, #8)
[Link]
That group is merely a bunch of LF member companies coming together to work
Remember, Meego is just like the "Carrier Grade Linux" project, neither
Greg Kroah-Hartman moves to the Linux Foundation
Greg Kroah-Hartman moves to the Linux Foundation
Greg Kroah-Hartman moves to the Linux Foundation
For sure! This "Greg Kroah-Hartman" "guy" is like that "PJ" "gal" over at Groklaw. No single person can do that much work.
Greg Kroah-Hartman moves to the Linux Foundation
Greg Kroah-Hartman moves to the Linux Foundation
Greg Kroah-Hartman moves to the Linux Foundation
Greg Kroah-Hartman moves to the Linux Foundation
Greg Kroah-Hartman moves to the Linux Foundation
Greg Kroah-Hartman moves to the Linux Foundation
Greg Kroah-Hartman moves to the Linux Foundation
Greg Kroah-Hartman moves to the Linux Foundation
Greg Kroah-Hartman moves to the Linux Foundation
on a project in a shared area, which is what the LF facilitates for its
member companies. It does this for a number of different projects.
of which represent an "official" LF position at all.