Garrett: The ongoing fight against GPL enforcement
Garrett: The ongoing fight against GPL enforcement
Posted Feb 1, 2012 0:15 UTC (Wed) by nybble41 (subscriber, #55106)In reply to: Garrett: The ongoing fight against GPL enforcement by dlang
Parent article: Garrett: The ongoing fight against GPL enforcement
If course, if you still think proprietary licenses are easier, you're welcome to avoid GPL software. It's your loss.
Posted Feb 1, 2012 0:23 UTC (Wed)
by dlang (guest, #313)
[Link]
yes, there are conflicting cases on this that have weakened first sale, but there's still teeth in it.
Posted Feb 1, 2012 5:52 UTC (Wed)
by dlang (guest, #313)
[Link]
yes, first sale applies to GPL code as well.
If it didn't you would see people sueing wallmart, best buy, etc instead of Cisco (after all, you probably didn't buy the netgear access point directly from Cisco.
Looking at this from another way.
If someone doesn't copy anything, then there is no way for a copyright license to apply.
So if you were to buy devices with GPL code in them, not copy anything, and sell them again, there is no way that a copyright license can force you to do anything as you are not making any copy.
What "first sale" would _not_ give you is any right to make copies of the GPL code
This doesn't help the supplier problem because the supplier isn't providing you with a separate copy of the binary for each device, they are giving you source code (or a file binary) that you then copy on to each device.
Garrett: The ongoing fight against GPL enforcement
Garrett: The ongoing fight against GPL enforcement