Clarification on a few points
Clarification on a few points
Posted Jan 31, 2012 19:03 UTC (Tue) by tbird20d (subscriber, #1901)In reply to: Clarification on a few points by rahvin
Parent article: Garrett: The ongoing fight against GPL enforcement
In practice, it would make things easier if my suppliers didn't ship any GPL user-space code to me. At Sony, we'll put on our own user-space GPL code. We have good practices in place for managing our GPL responsibilities in this case, thank you very much. In the case of kernel code, to my knowledge we've never had a problem with a supplier providing correct sources for this.
I understand why this is sub-optimal in the grand scheme of things, because it detracts from the community value of GPL user-space code.
Posted Jan 31, 2012 20:38 UTC (Tue)
by landley (guest, #6789)
[Link] (3 responses)
Did you guys not NOTICE?
http://www.itworld.com/it-managementstrategy/233753/gpl-c...
Google's "No GPL in userspace" thing is very much _not_ an isolated incident. Those of us who were big GPLv2 advocates and don't like GPLv3, what did you EXPECT us to do when you tried to shove v3 down our throats?
Posted Jan 31, 2012 20:58 UTC (Tue)
by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Jan 31, 2012 23:18 UTC (Tue)
by landley (guest, #6789)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Jan 31, 2012 23:47 UTC (Tue)
by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239)
[Link]
Clarification on a few points
Clarification on a few points
Clarification on a few points
Clarification on a few points