The journald design is horrible to the point of useless
The journald design is horrible to the point of useless
Posted Dec 2, 2011 19:06 UTC (Fri) by dlang (guest, #313)In reply to: The journald design is horrible to the point of useless by raven667
Parent article: That newfangled Journal thing
I think that may people would agree with you, including a LOT of the people who are being critical of LP and this proposal.
there are good reasons (and not just personal animosity or his license choice) that DJB's software did not take over the world.
Posted Dec 2, 2011 22:50 UTC (Fri)
by anselm (subscriber, #2796)
[Link] (1 responses)
However, some of DJB's ideas did become popular on technical merit. Maildir comes to mind.
I don't think Lennart and Kay are doing badly in comparison at all. Systemd in particular is likely to go a lot farther than Qmail or DJBDNS ever did, simply because, whatever its detractors may say, it does have all kinds of advantages compared to SysV init (the situation is a lot more obvious than with, say, Qmail vs. other MTAs) and the two don't go for DJB-style rest-of-the-world-be-damned my-way-or-the-highway backwards incompatibility in quite the same way. After all, systemd still interfaces with SysV init scripts and traditional syslogd but in a manner that introduces interesting and useful new features.
As far as journald is concerned, we'll have to see; maybe the future will just be a closer association between systemd and rsyslogd, which wouldn't be a bad thing either.
Posted Dec 3, 2011 3:39 UTC (Sat)
by raven667 (subscriber, #5198)
[Link]
I hope this journal thing leads to some improvements but I'm less certain that the journal as described is the be all and end all of logging. Let's see where it goes.
LP: the new DJB?
there are good reasons (and not just personal animosity or his license choice) that DJB's software did not take over the world.
LP: the new DJB?