Stable kernel 3.0.7
Stable kernel 3.0.7
Posted Oct 17, 2011 18:13 UTC (Mon) by rfunk (subscriber, #4054)In reply to: Stable kernel 3.0.7 by theophrastus
Parent article: Stable kernel 3.0.7
The announcement says:
The updated 3.0.y git tree can be found at (NOTE THE ADDRESS CHANGE):
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git linux-3.0.y
Which means to get 3.0.7 you type:
git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git linux-3.0.7
Posted Oct 17, 2011 18:17 UTC (Mon)
by theophrastus (guest, #80847)
[Link]
Posted Oct 17, 2011 18:32 UTC (Mon)
by dlang (guest, #313)
[Link] (1 responses)
the initial clone is relativly slow, but in the future you can go to that directory and just do 'git pull' to pull down all changes since the last time you did so (followed by 'git checkout <version> to get the version you are interested in at the moment)
Posted Oct 18, 2011 6:26 UTC (Tue)
by mtaht (subscriber, #11087)
[Link]
git clone --reference linux-2.6 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git linux-3.0.7
git checkout [the_tag_you_want]
Posted Oct 17, 2011 18:42 UTC (Mon)
by dougg (guest, #1894)
[Link] (12 responses)
Posted Oct 17, 2011 19:27 UTC (Mon)
by gregkh (subscriber, #8)
[Link] (8 responses)
Posted Oct 17, 2011 21:08 UTC (Mon)
by chrisV (guest, #43417)
[Link] (7 responses)
If the archive is busted, it should be taken down. If it isn't busted, then just put the diffs there. This limbo-land is inexplicable.
Posted Oct 17, 2011 21:16 UTC (Mon)
by gregkh (subscriber, #8)
[Link] (6 responses)
If you read the information posted to lkml about the rebuild of kernel.org, you will see that we have a new tool, and process, to do this.
It takes time to implement all of this, sorry.
Posted Oct 17, 2011 22:52 UTC (Mon)
by rankincj (guest, #4865)
[Link] (5 responses)
Posted Oct 17, 2011 23:13 UTC (Mon)
by gregkh (subscriber, #8)
[Link] (3 responses)
You can do it this way, yes. Better yet, just take an existing clone you have laying around, and suck in the 3.0.y branch only. Very small bandwidth, and all should be good.
If you know of a different way to get the 3.0.7 release at the moment, please let us know (besides emailing me directly and asking for the patch, which I've already done for a few people who asked very nicely.)
Posted Oct 17, 2011 23:28 UTC (Mon)
by rankincj (guest, #4865)
[Link]
Did I get the gitweb command URL wrong, or something please?
Posted Oct 20, 2011 12:17 UTC (Thu)
by chrisV (guest, #43417)
[Link] (1 responses)
wget "https://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-s..."
Or to go from v3.1-rc4 to v3.1-rc10 with:
wget "https://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux..."
(In that case, Documentation/networking/scaling.txt throws up a reject when you apply the patch, which you have to fix by hand, because the git patch generator did not seem to deal correctly with non-ASCII quote/unquote characters in that file.)
You can use the torvalds branch to go from 3.0 to 3.1-rc10, although that's a big one, or between any other tagged versions. You can also use curl rather than wget, or a browser.
Posted Oct 21, 2011 0:05 UTC (Fri)
by theophrastus (guest, #80847)
[Link]
Posted Oct 18, 2011 4:32 UTC (Tue)
by geuder (subscriber, #62854)
[Link]
I guess using the --depth option could save some bandwidth. If you do it right after the announcememt --depth 1 should be enough, if newer commits exist getting the right depth might be trickier. But even if you are extra cautious a select a depth of several hundreds, the saving should still be significant.
Disclaimer: Untested guessing. On holidays with my phone only. Although it runs Linux I must admit I have not installed git.
Posted Oct 17, 2011 19:45 UTC (Mon)
by cesarb (subscriber, #6266)
[Link]
Posted Oct 17, 2011 20:09 UTC (Mon)
by rankincj (guest, #4865)
[Link] (1 responses)
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git;a=commitdiff;h=v3.0.7;hp=v3.0.6
But the resulting diff failed to apply:
patching file drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_dp.c
Am I just revealing my miserable lack of "git-fu" here, or is there a deeper problem?
Posted Oct 18, 2011 7:19 UTC (Tue)
by epierre (subscriber, #60841)
[Link]
Étienne
Posted Oct 18, 2011 2:02 UTC (Tue)
by nlucas (guest, #33793)
[Link] (1 responses)
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-st...
Click on the "tree" link and then click on the "snapshot" link.
It will return a nice tar.gz snapshot of the tree, without the need to use git.
Posted Oct 18, 2011 2:43 UTC (Tue)
by dlang (guest, #313)
[Link]
thank you! lurker sinking back into the tar pit now.
Stable kernel 3.0.7
Stable kernel 3.0.7
Stable kernel 3.0.7
Stable kernel 3.0.7
Stable kernel 3.0.7
Stable kernel 3.0.7
Stable kernel 3.0.7
Stable kernel 3.0.7
Stable kernel 3.0.7
I don't have a git tree, but I did originally try extracting the incremental patch using gitweb. I thought that might work (in a bandwidth-friendly sort of way), although in practice the results were slightly less than spectacular...
Stable kernel 3.0.7
Stable kernel 3.0.7
Stable kernel 3.0.7
Stable kernel 3.0.7
Stable kernel 3.0.7
I tried generating my own incremental patch thus:
Stable kernel 3.0.7
Hunk #1 succeeded at 128 with fuzz 1 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 162.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 234 (offset -4 lines).
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_dp.c.rej
Stable kernel 3.0.7
Stable kernel 3.0.7
Stable kernel 3.0.7