Ksplice and CentOS
Ksplice and CentOS
Posted Jul 30, 2011 17:04 UTC (Sat) by sbergman27 (guest, #10767)Parent article: Ksplice and CentOS
But still, I don't see a ksplice channel being attractive to folks who might require it until the CentOS project at least does a thorough and prolonged job of demonstrating that they are alive and dependable.
Sincerely,
Steve Bergman
Oklahoma City, OK (A suburb of Tuttle)
Posted Aug 5, 2011 3:11 UTC (Fri)
by slashdot (guest, #22014)
[Link] (1 responses)
However the GPLv2 clearly says:
So if RHEL can't be readily build, then informing both the FSF GPL violation contacts and Red Hat legal could be effective.
Posted Aug 5, 2011 4:00 UTC (Fri)
by elanthis (guest, #6227)
[Link]
What the CentOS folks are complaining about is that simply having a bunch of SRPMs does not make it particularly easy to build them all in the right order and to install them correctly to bootstrap a working OS image comprised of all those individual GPLed components. Requiring that would be similar to requiring that you provide the rsync scripts you use to mirror ftp.gnu.org so that end-users of your mirror can recreate it.
Ksplice and CentOS
"For an executable work, complete source code means all the source code for all modules it contains, plus any associated interface definition files, plus the scripts used to control compilation and installation of the executable"
Ksplice and CentOS