|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Are all patches created equal?

Are all patches created equal?

Posted Jul 21, 2011 23:11 UTC (Thu) by iabervon (subscriber, #722)
Parent article: Are all patches created equal?

Obviously, Microsoft shouldn't get extra credit for writing a driver that needed at least 366 patches of cleaning and then doing that cleaning. Ultimately, the total value of the original submission, cleanup done before the 3.0 cycle, these 366 patches, and the rest of the cleanup that needs to be done is one useful driver (with no useful development history). In the end, Microsoft will have contributed one good thing, and done it substantially in 3.0 and substantially in the original submission. Whatever you count positive here, you have to deduct from the earlier value.


to post comments

Are all patches created equal?

Posted Jul 22, 2011 0:01 UTC (Fri) by dlang (guest, #313) [Link]

one thing that complicates this issue is that they are the big contributer to the 3.0 release

if this was to the 2.6.41 release, few people would care.

but the fact that the number is incrementing to 3.0 makes people assume that there are orders of magnitude more changes going into 3.0 than went into 2.6.39

the "what's new in 3.0" document that lists all the changes since 2.6.0 helps confuse the issue as well.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds