Fedora, systemd, and changes
Fedora, systemd, and changes
Posted Jun 16, 2011 15:12 UTC (Thu) by jake (editor, #205)In reply to: Fedora, systemd, and changes by cdmiller
Parent article: Fedora, systemd, and changes
> becomes accepted by experienced systems administrators
who presumably won't be running Fedora to begin with ... unless they like being required to upgrade every 13 months or so ...
i don't doubt that the complaints will keep coming, but they seem a bit misguided at this point ... Fedora has made its choice, endlessly arguing that it shouldn't have made that choice (or that systemd is flawed at the architecture level) is fairly pointless it seems to me ... either proposing that the change be reverted for Fedora 16 or working on fixing the actual problems that are being found would seem like the right way forward at this point.
jake
Posted Jun 16, 2011 15:31 UTC (Thu)
by vonbrand (subscriber, #4458)
[Link] (2 responses)
I for one suspect SystemD will be at least an alternative in RHEL 7, and also in the next SLES...
Posted Jun 17, 2011 12:56 UTC (Fri)
by wookey (guest, #5501)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Jun 18, 2011 8:24 UTC (Sat)
by tzafrir (subscriber, #11501)
[Link]
Fedora, systemd, and changes
Fedora, systemd, and changes
Fedora, systemd, and changes