Fedora, systemd, and changes

Posted Jun 16, 2011 5:07 UTC (Thu) by tzafrir (subscriber, #11501)
In reply to: Fedora, systemd, and changes by ringerc
Parent article: Fedora, systemd, and changes

Just to note that Debian's RC scripts do provide both parallel boot and dependency management. Dependency management has been in SuSE for years and borrowed from there.

Also note that the less things you do in parallel, the less memory you waste. A bit more memory used at system startup and then released is negligable. SystemD actually uses more memory for the init process that runs the whole time (well: a bit more. Nothing much that I really care about, but still).

Nitpicking aside: from the little I looked into SystemD, it seems nice, and and something I want to use.

Fedora, systemd, and changes

Posted Jun 17, 2011 1:07 UTC (Fri) by phess (subscriber, #74656) [Link] (1 responses)

ringerc, please please please: it's "systemd", NOT "SystemD".

Fedora, systemd, and changes

Posted Jun 17, 2011 1:32 UTC (Fri) by phess (subscriber, #74656) [Link]

Rephrasing:

tzafrir, please please please: it's "systemd", NOT "SystemD".