Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem
Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem
Posted Jun 12, 2011 4:00 UTC (Sun) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)In reply to: Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem by butlerm
Parent article: Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem
There is nothing to complain about, really. Everyone should have backups and if you don't want to use Btrfs as default, pick something else like Ext4 or XFS which are going to be supported options forever till you feel it is mature but it is not going to considered mature automatically without some distribution taking the first step. Fedora happens to be really good at that and it fits the distribution goals perfectly. Even if you don't use Fedora, what Fedora does, still benefits you. What more could one ask for.
Posted Jun 12, 2011 14:49 UTC (Sun)
by MisterIO (guest, #36192)
[Link] (16 responses)
Posted Jun 12, 2011 16:23 UTC (Sun)
by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
[Link] (12 responses)
Posted Jun 13, 2011 7:04 UTC (Mon)
by elanthis (guest, #6227)
[Link] (11 responses)
This is _really_ hard for computer nerds to accept -- especially so for developer-focused FOSS types whose circle of friends is mostly other developers -- but the regular user doesn't know what a backup is at anything more than a vague conceptual level, and he doesn't care because his computer is just a tool to get stuff done and learning computer terminology or programs or shortcuts is boring as crap and a waste of his time. Just like most FOSS developers probably couldn't tell the difference between a carburetor and a fuel injector without Googling them, most "casual users" can't tell the difference between a program and a document. Not because they're stupid, but just because they flat out don't freaking care, and would much much much rather spend their time out with friends or family, or outside, or watching TV, or playing games, or hitting the bar, or getting laid (as JWZ famously put it in his Groupware Bad article).
This is part of the reason why the OSes and platforms that target _real_ casual users remove the need for backups in the first place, by relying on either automatic or forced synchronization to other devices as often as possible or by syncing all documents and settings to "the Cloud." In other words, the backup always happens and is so ingrained into the system's use model that the user doesn't even need to be aware that it's happening.
When we get back into the realm of the scary/annoying/complicated desktop OS systems (be it Windows, OS X, Linux, or anything else), the only thing that saves the user from his own low give-a-crap meter is the expectation that the system will not randomly lose all his data because the vendor couldn't be bothered to make it stable enough for casual use.
I mean, seriously, we live in a world where a great number of "casual users" pay Apple or Best Buy a not-inconsiderable chunk of money to transfer files to new computers or recover files from fubar'd OS installs because the very act of copying files from one disk to another is not in their repertoire of computer skills. Or to look at it another way, we live in a world where anti-virus is pre-installed on 99% of Windows PCs because an overwhelming number of "casual users" (many of them self-proclaimed tech experts due to their frequent reading of PC Magazine and pcworld.com) still think that clicking Yes when the dialog "Naked_Hot_Actress_Screensaver.exe is from an untrusted source, are you sure you want to run this application?" pops up is a good idea.
Posted Jun 13, 2011 7:51 UTC (Mon)
by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
[Link] (7 responses)
I don't about your experiences but as I already noted, I know many casual desktop users (not developers) who do regularly take backups because they have lost data in the past and they cannot afford to do so again. This has nothing to do with the stability of the filesystem but often just physical hardware failures, viruses, accidental deletion of data and so on.
My point remains, everyone should have backups for their important data. It seems you fully agree with that and you are talking about implementation details like whether it should be automated and where the data should be stored. Anything that makes backup easier is fine by me.
Posted Jun 13, 2011 9:54 UTC (Mon)
by elanthis (guest, #6227)
[Link] (6 responses)
Your friends and family and coworkers are not normal casual users, if for no other reason than because they know you. Your personal anecdotes are as utterly meaningless as mine or anyone else's. If you can't step back and look at the larger picture outside your personal bubble then you are going to continue being really out of touch with what regular computer users are like. You can't look at your Aunt Tillie and use that as a measure of what an average computer user is like; you have to look at someone else's Aunt Tillie who has no nephew who's a bad-ass programmer, and in fact no contact at all with anyone who's more knowledgeable about computers than a CompUSA salesman.
Posted Jun 13, 2011 10:24 UTC (Mon)
by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
[Link] (5 responses)
So you agree that they need backups for all their important data. Since I never claimed that they need it more than anywhere else, we are in complete agreement.
Anyone who is using Btrfs as this point or in the near future is hardly likely to be a casual desktop user anyway. So I hardly see why we are so bothered about my single statement that everyone should have backups.
The following is a side point but you are assuming a lot. Nowhere did I claim nor imply that I am helping anyone setup backups. In fact, I do not and I played no part at all in them setting up backups. Maybe my experience is different but since I never said that this was the average end user experience, there is no need to argue about that or assume that. So far, I haven't seen any neutral data on how many average end users actually do backups. Your opinions don't count.
Posted Jun 14, 2011 21:12 UTC (Tue)
by elanthis (guest, #6227)
[Link] (4 responses)
Here's the very first link for "user backups study" which incidentally claims that 92% of users do not perform regular backups. The results page on Google has a number of other such papers and reports from other sources.
http://www.backblaze.com/press-June-is-Backup-Awareness-M...
Posted Jun 15, 2011 8:40 UTC (Wed)
by jezuch (subscriber, #52988)
[Link] (2 responses)
On the other hand it says that as many as 8% of users *do* perform regular backups. Isn't it kinda optimistic? ;)
Posted Jun 17, 2011 22:02 UTC (Fri)
by skierpage (guest, #70911)
[Link]
(I don't trust either of them, I occasionally fiddle with Unison and rsync to synchronize key directories to a storage drive where I can see files.)
Posted Jun 21, 2011 13:26 UTC (Tue)
by ssam (guest, #46587)
[Link]
maybe the distro installers should be asking people to choose a backup device.
Posted Jun 15, 2011 8:42 UTC (Wed)
by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
[Link]
Posted Jun 17, 2011 15:37 UTC (Fri)
by jeremiah (subscriber, #1221)
[Link] (1 responses)
Sorry for the off topic, but was just trying to figure out what kind fuel injectors to get this morning so your post just struck me. :)
Posted Jun 17, 2011 23:15 UTC (Fri)
by elanthis (guest, #6227)
[Link]
Posted Jun 18, 2011 14:42 UTC (Sat)
by lab (guest, #51153)
[Link]
As "depressing" as it sounds, I would have to agree with you. In my experience through a couple of decades as the "home computer support guy", I would say, that the overwhelming majority of people consider (all forms of) computers as utilities that needs to just work automagically the way they want them to. I have (very slowly) resigned to the fact, that nothing I will ever say or do is going to change that. That is also why I think that ChromeOS (and the likes) should gain widespread usage - it's simply the only way forward.
Posted Jun 13, 2011 2:14 UTC (Mon)
by cowsandmilk (guest, #55475)
[Link]
Posted Jun 13, 2011 3:27 UTC (Mon)
by Hausvib6 (guest, #70606)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Jun 16, 2011 10:13 UTC (Thu)
by Cato (guest, #7643)
[Link]
Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem
Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem
Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem
Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem
Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem
Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem
Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem
Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem
software nags some into backing up
Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem
Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem
Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem
Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem
Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem
Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem
Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem
"ext4fs sucks"
"btrfs is still experimental, how dare you make it as my default fs!"
"linux ate my data"
etc.
Fedora 16 to use Btrfs as its default filesystem