Ubuntu 6.06 LTS ("Dapper Drake") end of life
Ubuntu 6.06 LTS ("Dapper Drake") end of life
Posted Jun 2, 2011 13:26 UTC (Thu) by tzafrir (subscriber, #11501)In reply to: Ubuntu 6.06 LTS ("Dapper Drake") end of life by dgm
Parent article: Ubuntu 6.06 LTS ("Dapper Drake") end of life
Posted Jun 2, 2011 14:21 UTC (Thu)
by dgm (subscriber, #49227)
[Link] (9 responses)
Posted Jun 2, 2011 16:20 UTC (Thu)
by HenrikH (subscriber, #31152)
[Link]
In to that Ubuntu had to support 5 other versions of it's distribution at the same time. This with different versions of the software in each distribution. And they do it free of charge.
To that I would also add that releasing Service Packs for XP is completely different user experience from getting patches since the Service Packs often change behavior of the current software and also introduces new functionality, I would say that MS has a very long way before they can give enterprise support similar to that of say Red Hat.
Posted Jun 2, 2011 20:07 UTC (Thu)
by pr1268 (guest, #24648)
[Link] (7 responses)
Windows XP support (supposedly) includes the base operating system and utilities (i.e., all user applications which came on the WinXP CD-ROM or storebought computer). In contrast, Ubuntu's support includes the whole distro, including all the various user applications. This is likely an order of magnitude more software than WinXP. Presumably, Microsoft has a separate support lifecycle schedule for its Office suite, PC-based games, and other programs sold separately from Windows. MS probably also has a separate schedule for various releases of Internet Explorer (even though it is "bundled" with the OS).
Posted Jun 2, 2011 20:12 UTC (Thu)
by Trelane (subscriber, #56877)
[Link] (1 responses)
To be fair, this is only because of Firefox, a threat they resurrected the dead IE team to fight. ;)
Posted Jun 5, 2011 2:36 UTC (Sun)
by pr1268 (guest, #24648)
[Link]
Well, I was referring to bug-fix and security updates, but yes, you make a good point about IE having to be more innovative (with wholesale version upgrades) once the real threat of competition showed its face... Of course, nowadays there's more competition than just Firefox—Opera is still around (and actively supported), Google Chrome is making headway, and Apple's Safari is present (in the proprietary OS arena). I find it wildly ironic that Apple seems to be pushing Safari for Windows whilst MS yanked IE for Mac. Go figure...
Posted Jun 2, 2011 20:39 UTC (Thu)
by dlang (guest, #313)
[Link]
In addition, what microsoft supports isn't winXP as it was released 10 years ago, they support the version as of the latest major service pack, which changes enough stuff that if it were a linux distro it would probably rate a new version.
Posted Jun 3, 2011 0:19 UTC (Fri)
by ewan (guest, #5533)
[Link] (3 responses)
The whole server distro; no desktop stuff. So that's no X, no Gnome, no OpenOffice, no Firefox etc. That makes it rather a lot smaller.
Posted Jun 3, 2011 8:38 UTC (Fri)
by Karellen (subscriber, #67644)
[Link] (2 responses)
Yeah, sure that's smaller than Windows XP. /sarcasm
Posted Jun 3, 2011 11:50 UTC (Fri)
by pboddie (guest, #50784)
[Link]
Oh, and I once tried upgrading an installation from 6.06 LTS to 8.04 LTS (having installed from 6.06 media which was the only thing I had lying around), and after being instructed to use some Ubuntu-specific tool (apt-get not being enough, apparently), the thing decided to give up on the idea. That would worry me if I were still using 6.06.
Posted Jun 3, 2011 23:41 UTC (Fri)
by chad.netzer (subscriber, #4257)
[Link]
Ubuntu 6.06 LTS ("Dapper Drake") end of life
Ubuntu 6.06 LTS ("Dapper Drake") end of life
Ubuntu 6.06 LTS ("Dapper Drake") end of life
Ubuntu 6.06 LTS ("Dapper Drake") end of life
Ubuntu 6.06 LTS ("Dapper Drake") end of life
Ubuntu 6.06 LTS ("Dapper Drake") end of life
Ubuntu 6.06 LTS ("Dapper Drake") end of life
Ubuntu's support includes the whole distro
Ubuntu 6.06 LTS ("Dapper Drake") end of life
Ubuntu 6.06 LTS ("Dapper Drake") end of life
Ubuntu 6.06 LTS ("Dapper Drake") end of life