Why isn't desktop Linux "finished"?
Why isn't desktop Linux "finished"?
Posted May 18, 2011 13:26 UTC (Wed) by Cato (guest, #7643)In reply to: Why isn't desktop Linux "finished"? by nix
Parent article: Poettering: Why systemd?
The 10.04 LTS upgrade has been a disaster, the person using has said she wants to stop using Ubuntu as a result. Hopefully going to a more recent Ubuntu (maybe 10.10) will fix the Intel KMS problems.
Can anyone recommend a good Ubuntu or similar distro version (Mint, Mepis, Debian, with reasonably quick security updates) that has KMS working well on Intel GMA3100 or similar, without random freezes? I don't want to try getting a newer Xorg and kernel working on 10.04, as the idea of this PC is to be low maintenance and reliable for the next 2-3 years.